|
Human
Rights Committee
70th
session (Geneva, 16 October to 3 November 2000)
During this session the Committee gave consideration to the second report
of Gabon, the third report of Argentina, the third and fourth reports of Trinidad
and Tobago, and the fourth reports of Peru and Denmark.
1. Reports
by States
Argentina
The State party’s report focuses on its activities
on indigenous matters and its contributions to the draft Inter-American Declaration
on Indigenous
Peoples. Other indigenous initiatives were explained orally. The delegation
also gave explanations on the derogation of amnesty laws, which allow for the
trial of former military personnel involved in human rights violations. The
Committee welcomed these initiatives together with those made in relation to
torture and disappearances.
The Committee expressed concern about the continuing uncertainty regarding
the Covenant’s status within Argentinean domestic law. The Federal system
gives responsibility to the provinces in critical areas such as the administration
of justice, which creates an additional problem for the implementation of the
Covenant. While pleased by the positive developments in overcoming the injustices
committed during the military regime, the Committee remained concerned that
those who had been accused of human rights violations still serve in the military.
Some have even enjoyed promotion. Their removal from office and prosecution
are essential. Concern was expressed at the widespread use of unnecessary pre-trial
detention and the overcrowding and poor quality of basic necessities in prisons.
The Committee felt that there is inaccuracy in the present report on the issues
of torture and excessive use of force by law enforcement officials. The remaining
areas of concern were: the continuing attacks against human rights defenders,
judges and members of the media; the treatment of women; and the preferential
treatment afforded to the Catholic Church.
Denmark
The Committee commended Denmark for maintaining a high
level of respect for human rights generally. It was, however, disappointed
at Denmark’s failure
to withdraw its reservations to the Covenant and its failure to incorporate
the Covenant into domestic law. The Committee’s principal concerns and
recommendations surrounded the practice of solitary confinement, and issues
of equality and non-discrimination on the basis of sex, ethnicity and religious
belief. The Committee also noted that, under Danish immigration legislation,
DNA testing may be required in the establishment of family ties for reunification
purposes and the granting of a residence permit. Denmark was requested to ensure
such testing was used appropriately and only when necessary.
Gabon
The most contentious issue the Committee raised was
the prevalence of polygamy. The State party’s report portrays it as a social institution based on
cultural considerations. Legislation requires that women obey their husbands
because this obedience is as an affirmation of the latter’s position
as head of the family, not a form of slavery or a way of excluding women from
the family decision-making process. The Committee also expressed disquiet about
the lack of rights afforded to women in ownership and inheritance.
The Committee expressed concern at the lack of factual information concerning
the reality of human rights in Gabon. The Committee also commented on the
evasive nature of the delegation's responses. The State party’s failure to amend
domestic legislation was considered an indirect violation of its obligations
under the Convention.
Another area of concern was pre-trial detention and custody. The Committee
commented on the lack of segregation of the various types of prisoners
and detainees in some rural areas. They recommended the immediate abolition
of
imprisonment for unpaid civil debts. The Committee also underlined the
necessity to abolish the death penalty and the need for effective measures
to guarantee
the rights of persons belonging to all minorities.
Peru
Consideration of the Peruvian report occurred at a time of political crisis
for the country. The recently elected president, Mr Alberto Fuijimori, was
accused of fraud and other irregularities in his efforts to maintain power.
A few days after the examination of this report, the President was removed
after his resignation was rejected.
The Committee was informed that the system of "faceless judges" intended
to prosecute persons involved in terrorism had been removed. Terrorism itself
has diminished drastically, and the state of emergency has been lifted in some
areas. The Committee welcomed these achievements. The Committee also welcomed
the announcement of Presidential elections in 2001, hoping that they would
be in compliance with international standards.
The Committee regretted that many of the recommendations made in relation
to the previous periodic report had not been followed up. The Committee
remained concerned about the unclear status of the Covenant in Peru. The
prolonged
reorganisation
of the judicial power was another major issue. Other concerns included:
detention in cases of terrorism and drug dealing; espionage; prison conditions;
allegations
of threats and harassment against journalists; general constraints on freedom
of expression; state intimidation of opposition members; and forced sterilisation
of women in rural areas.
Trinidad and Tobago
The primary focus of the discussion was the death penalty. The Committee was
informed of the recent re-categorisation of murder into three separate offences;
only some of which are punishable by death. The Committee recommended the immediate
abolition of flogging and whipping. Mandatory flogging can be inflicted upon
any male above the age of 16 convicted of the offences of robbery or aggravated
rape. While noting initiatives to reduce prison population, the results were
considered to be still incompatible with Article 10. The Standard Minimum Rules
for the Treatment of Prisoners should be given priority. The Committee expressed
concern about the conduct of police officers, including excessive use of force
and the vague formulation of the Police Act enabling officers to arrest persons
without a warrant in many circumstances. The Committee recommended that the
processing of police complaints be accelerated. A thorough review of domestic
law is still needed. Concern was also expressed at the lack of remedies for
victims of discrimination on the grounds of age, sexual orientation, pregnancy
or infection by HIV/AIDS.
2. Other issues
General comments
During the 68th session, the Committee adopted General
Comment No. 28. on Article 3 of the Covenant which replaced General Comment
No. 4, adopted in
1981. According to the updated Comment, the State party not only has a responsibility
to respect the equal rights of all human beings, but also to ensure that these
rights are provided for in their totality. State parties must take all necessary
steps to enable every person to enjoy those rights. Responsibility therefore
shifts from State protection to State empowerment. Echoing the Convention on
the elimination of Discrimination against Women, the General Comment reminds
State parties that they should ensure that traditional, historical, religious
or cultural attitudes are not used to justify violations of women’s rights
to equality before the law and to equal enjoyment of all Covenant rights. States
have a responsibility not only to report on the attitudes that jeopardise women’s
equality, but also on measures taken to overcome these societal factors. Such
information will enable the Committee to ascertain what a government is doing
to change the human rights situation of women. The importance of States’ reports
on factors such as states of emergence, internal conflicts and their effects,
as well as actions taken to improve the lot of women embroiled in such situations,
was also underlined.
The Committee also completed its first reading, during its 68th session, of
the draft General Comment on Article 4 of the Covenant, which addresses the
scope of limitations to human rights during a state of emergency or martial
law. During the 69th session of the Committee a brief public meeting was also
held to discuss this General Comment.
World Conference against Racism
During the three sessions held during 2000, the Committee
gave consideration to its contribution to the World Conference against Racism.
Due to time constraints,
the Committee was unable to prepare a document for the first Preparatory Committee
meeting in May. Mr Solari Yrigoyen of Argentina represented the Committee at
the aforesaid meeting. By the 70thsession however, the Committee adopted a
text of this preliminary contribution to the second Preparatory Committee.
In this document, the Committee shares the concern of the international community
that racism continues to be a scourge on humanity and a threat to peace and
security in the world. The Committee decided that they would undertake the
preparation of a General Comment dealing with the application of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In preparation for this, a compilation
of the Committee’s materials reflecting some of its past decisions concerning
racism and related issues was compiled. This compilation includes extracts
of concluding observations on such issues that were presented to States parties
after having considered their reports. It also includes summaries of the Committee’s
views in two communications submitted under the Optional Protocol to the Covenant
and General Comments that addressed questions relating to racism.
Informal meeting
During the 70th session, the Human Rights Committee held an informal meeting
with States parties to the Covenant to improve the country reporting process
and avoid duplication of the work of the six human rights treaty bodies. Representatives
from the following States parties participated: Algeria, Argentina, Australia,
Canada, Chile, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, New Zealand,
United Kingdom and United States of America. Among the points raised, it was
felt by many that the creation of sub-committees and working groups to examine
the situation of duplication was a further workload and financial burden to
the UN system. Regarding communications, individual complaints had been received
from at least 65 of the 95 States parties to the Optional Protocol to the Covenant.
From the periodic reports from the remaining 30 States, it was evident that
the Optional Protocol had not been made known to citizens so that they could
use it in the event of violations of their rights under the Covenant. The need
for adequate personnel to process communications and correspondence from individuals
seeking individual redress was also noted.
Top |